Comparison of velocity-based and traditional percentage-based loading methods on maximal strength and power adaptations The referenced article can be viewed here.Click for Downloadable Image Read more articles Previous PostPractical Nutritional Recovery Strategies For Elite Soccer Players When Limited Time Separates Repeated Matches Next PostWake up and smell the coffee: caffeine supplementation and exercise performance – an umbrella review of 21 published meta-analyses You Might Also Like Athlete-Reported Outcome Measures for Monitoring Training Responses: A Systematic Review of Risk of Bias and Measurement Property Quality According to the COSMIN Guidelines 11/16/2020 The Association Between the Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio and Injury and its Application in Team Sports: A Systematic Review 11/25/2019 Training Load and Heart Rate Variability Associated with Overuse Injury in CrossFit Athletes 04/12/2018
Athlete-Reported Outcome Measures for Monitoring Training Responses: A Systematic Review of Risk of Bias and Measurement Property Quality According to the COSMIN Guidelines 11/16/2020
The Association Between the Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio and Injury and its Application in Team Sports: A Systematic Review 11/25/2019
Training Load and Heart Rate Variability Associated with Overuse Injury in CrossFit Athletes 04/12/2018